Why Google Buzz Is Bad: In a Nutshell
Almost instantly upon debuting yesterday, Google’s new Buzz social-media platform has had privacy-watchers up in arms–and rightly so. Already, Cnet has posted two detailed articles on the matter, calling Google Buzz a privacy nightmare and exploring how hard it is to disable your Buzz account.
Read those articles for a wonderfully detailed look into Google’s amazing social-media misstep. Here’s the problem in a nutshell:
Other major social-media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn allow you to choose on your own who you’re going to follow and whether strangers can see who you’re following. Google Buzz, however, makes those decision for you, and without your advance consent.
In what seems like an effort to jump-start the Buzz service, entirely without getting your permission first, Google:
- Mines all of your regular Gmail recipients;
- Autofollows them; and
- Shows the world who they are.
That means, right now Google is broadcasting to the world the identities of people in the address books of everyone with a Gmail account–without their advance consent, and I would bet in most instances probably without their knowledge, either. Didn’t know you were already on Buzz? If you’re a Gmail user, your account has been live since yesterday–there’s no opt-in, and as Cnet notes, a very laborious method is required to opt-out.
Here’s how that differs from the right way to do things. Facebook and Twitter also let you mine email contacts, autofollow them, and show the list of who you’re following to the world. But those services give you a choice in advance of each of the those three steps. You can choose all three, a combination, or opt out of them entirely. You’re asked for advanced consent in order to protect your rights to privacy and to have control over your own privacy.
Google Buzz gives you no such advance control whatsoever. And taking away every vestige of social media-standard advance consent sure sounds like an invasion of privacy to me. How about you?
As of November 2011, my subscriber feed has changed! To get the new feed, go here or click the orange logo in the right sidebar. Thanks for being a regular reader!
Other posts you might like from Chicago Carless:
Chicago nonprofits and businesses often use unpaid social media interns as a cheap way to gain institutional knowledge about building online community. But according to the U.S. Department of Labor, federal law requires that unpaid internships be for the benefit of the intern--not the company. And now the fed is investigati...
While I settle down from the throttling I got from my fellow Mac users over my recently announced decision to migrate to Windows 7, here's a look at the no-less debate-worthy topics I've covered lately on Chicagosphere, my byline about the local blogosphere on the Chicago Tribune's ChicagoNow network.
While I continue on my way out the OS X door, I'd like to respond to the commenters who let me know in no uncertain terms that they don't agree with my opinions about the Mac platform. Tough.
3 Comments
Trackbacks
- Google Should Reboot Buzz to Bring Back Informed Consent | CHICAGO CARLESS
- Is There Anyone New to Find on Google Buzz? | CHICAGO CARLESS
Late Thursday, Google tweaked the privacy settings of Buzz to make it easier for users to block other from seeing their followers and those whom they’re following. Writing “users” kind of sticks in my fingers, though, since Gmail users still don’t have the choice to opt-in to become Buzz users. Google is still opting Gmail users in and autofollowing their most frequent email recipients without their consent.
That’s still not acceptable. Google needs to absolutely eliminate auto-following without consent. If a Gmail user hasn’t specifically chosen to follow someone in Buzz, Google should not take it upon themselves to connect the two together. Google has no right to remove consent here. That they don’t understand that is the most disappointing part for me.