<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chicago Big-Box Wage Debate: Follow-up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chicagocarless.com/2006/07/24/chicago-big-box-wage-debate-follow-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chicagocarless.com/2006/07/24/chicago-big-box-wage-debate-follow-up/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=chicago-big-box-wage-debate-follow-up</link>
	<description>My off-road journey to Judaism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:03:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CHICAGO CARLESS</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagocarless.com/2006/07/24/chicago-big-box-wage-debate-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>CHICAGO CARLESS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagocarless.com/wp/?p=136#comment-224</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lamenting the New Chicago Big Box Ordinance&lt;/strong&gt;

Well, the Chicago city council exercised its will yesterday, passing the controversial big-box $10 wage bill by a veto-proof 35 to 14 margin. Previous discussion here on Chicago Carless examined both sides of the issue. Now, as the dust settles...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lamenting the New Chicago Big Box Ordinance</strong></p>
<p>Well, the Chicago city council exercised its will yesterday, passing the controversial big-box $10 wage bill by a veto-proof 35 to 14 margin. Previous discussion here on Chicago Carless examined both sides of the issue. Now, as the dust settles&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHICAGO CARLESS</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagocarless.com/2006/07/24/chicago-big-box-wage-debate-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>CHICAGO CARLESS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagocarless.com/wp/?p=136#comment-223</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;On Target&lt;/strong&gt;

(Credit: Jef poskanzer.) Today, an end of sorts finally came to Chicago&#039;s months-long big-box wage debate when, as expected, the City Council did not have enough votes to override the mayoral veto applied to the controversial new $10 wage...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>On Target</strong></p>
<p>(Credit: Jef poskanzer.) Today, an end of sorts finally came to Chicago&#8217;s months-long big-box wage debate when, as expected, the City Council did not have enough votes to override the mayoral veto applied to the controversial new $10 wage&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHICAGO CARLESS</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagocarless.com/2006/07/24/chicago-big-box-wage-debate-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>CHICAGO CARLESS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagocarless.com/wp/?p=136#comment-222</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;On Target&lt;/strong&gt;

(Credit: Jef poskanzer.) Today, an end of sorts finally came to Chicago&#039;s months-long big-box wage debate when, as expected, the City Council did not have enough votes to override the mayoral veto applied to the controversial new $10 wage...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>On Target</strong></p>
<p>(Credit: Jef poskanzer.) Today, an end of sorts finally came to Chicago&#8217;s months-long big-box wage debate when, as expected, the City Council did not have enough votes to override the mayoral veto applied to the controversial new $10 wage&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHICAGO CARLESS</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagocarless.com/2006/07/24/chicago-big-box-wage-debate-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>CHICAGO CARLESS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagocarless.com/wp/?p=136#comment-221</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;On Target&lt;/strong&gt;

(Credit: Jef poskanzer.) Today, an end of sorts finally came to Chicago&#039;s months-long big-box wage debate when, as expected, the City Council did not have enough votes to override the mayoral veto applied to the controversial new $10 wage...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>On Target</strong></p>
<p>(Credit: Jef poskanzer.) Today, an end of sorts finally came to Chicago&#8217;s months-long big-box wage debate when, as expected, the City Council did not have enough votes to override the mayoral veto applied to the controversial new $10 wage&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHICAGO CARLESS</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagocarless.com/2006/07/24/chicago-big-box-wage-debate-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>CHICAGO CARLESS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagocarless.com/wp/?p=136#comment-220</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lamenting the New Chicago Big Box Ordinance&lt;/strong&gt;

Well, the Chicago city council exercised its will yesterday, passing the controversial big-box $10 wage bill by a veto-proof 35 to 14 margin. Previous discussion here on Chicago Carless examined both sides of the issue. Now, as the dust settles...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lamenting the New Chicago Big Box Ordinance</strong></p>
<p>Well, the Chicago city council exercised its will yesterday, passing the controversial big-box $10 wage bill by a veto-proof 35 to 14 margin. Previous discussion here on Chicago Carless examined both sides of the issue. Now, as the dust settles&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagocarless.com/2006/07/24/chicago-big-box-wage-debate-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagocarless.com/wp/?p=136#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Bryan, I tend to agree with you.  I&#039;m a liberal but I really think this was an issue of liberals feeling powerless at the national level trying to make things change at the local level.  Oops!  Walmart is a national player.  It&#039;s apples and oranges and the only folks who&#039;ll lose out are Chicagoans.  Calling upon our representatives in Washington would have been more useful than allowing union interests to ram a bill through our city council.

Regarding Indy, hey, your city (like Chicago) had the presence of mind to spruce up its downtown.  In that alone you&#039;re miles ahead of some other Midwestern cities that still don&#039;t understand as goes the center so goes the city.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan, I tend to agree with you.  I&#8217;m a liberal but I really think this was an issue of liberals feeling powerless at the national level trying to make things change at the local level.  Oops!  Walmart is a national player.  It&#8217;s apples and oranges and the only folks who&#8217;ll lose out are Chicagoans.  Calling upon our representatives in Washington would have been more useful than allowing union interests to ram a bill through our city council.</p>
<p>Regarding Indy, hey, your city (like Chicago) had the presence of mind to spruce up its downtown.  In that alone you&#8217;re miles ahead of some other Midwestern cities that still don&#8217;t understand as goes the center so goes the city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagocarless.com/2006/07/24/chicago-big-box-wage-debate-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagocarless.com/wp/?p=136#comment-218</guid>
		<description>I think that the $10.00 minimum wage is a stupid idea, but I&#039;m happy to see Chicago give it a try.  If it turns out like I think it will, I&#039;ll get a giggle out of watching the natural consequences of Democrats run things.  If it turns out the opposite--things actually get better, then I&#039;m happy to be wrong about a matter like this.  But I really doubt that I&#039;ll turn out to be wrong.  At the very least, it will prove to be a good object lesson on such an extreme measure.  Likewise, self-destruction of Chicago&#039;s regional economic standing can only help Indianapolis.  Conversely, if implementing such a severe policy turns out to be a good thing, then it could point to a way for Indianapolis to improve its own economic situation.  Either way, this extreme measure will do some good.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the $10.00 minimum wage is a stupid idea, but I&#8217;m happy to see Chicago give it a try.  If it turns out like I think it will, I&#8217;ll get a giggle out of watching the natural consequences of Democrats run things.  If it turns out the opposite&#8211;things actually get better, then I&#8217;m happy to be wrong about a matter like this.  But I really doubt that I&#8217;ll turn out to be wrong.  At the very least, it will prove to be a good object lesson on such an extreme measure.  Likewise, self-destruction of Chicago&#8217;s regional economic standing can only help Indianapolis.  Conversely, if implementing such a severe policy turns out to be a good thing, then it could point to a way for Indianapolis to improve its own economic situation.  Either way, this extreme measure will do some good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

